Atlantic Poly Blog
Gallon Size Plastic Bags Made with Renewable Energy
As you already know, plastic bags are easier on the environment than paper. Atlantic Poly is where you can find gallon sized pleated plastic bags that are even easier on the environment than most. The uses and markets for polyethylene or poly bags are virtually endless. We have many sized and styles of plastic bags in stock too.
Atlantic Poly's layflat and gusseted bags are the perfect blend of technology and source reduction. They are made with 100% renewable energy from sources like wind and solar power. Our eco-conscious line is fully recyclable, completely non-toxic and performs so well, that you can feel confident using lighter gauge bags. It’s easy to source reduce with Atlantic Poly's layflat and gusseted bags.
Atlantic Poly medium and large layflat and gusseted bags are made from proprietary formulations. These plastic bags are engineered to provide three times the impact and twice the tensile strength of traditional low density polyethylene bags. They are formulated to provide better performance at lower gauges. That makes Atlantic Poly's layflat and gusseted bags easy on the environment, too.
Lighter density plastic bags are a good choice for items that are not heavy and require only a basic shield from their nearby environmental surroundings. Heavy density poly bags keep your goods safe from harm in more abusive environments where dirt, dust, moisture, and motion could damage your goods.
If you are looking for gallon size plastic bags, or any other size, contact Atlantic Poly.
LDPE and HDPE A Source of Multiple Common Household Recycled Products
We want you to know that Atlantic Poly is a steward of the earth's environment in that we work very hard to maximize the use of recycled source material throughout our entire supply process.
This blog will focus on the product nature and recycling promise of two
of our primary products: Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and High
Density Polyethylene (HDPE).
LDPE is the basic compound of
original commercial use of polyethylene. LPDE is characterized by good
toughness, resistance to chemicals, flexibility and clarity. It's an
excellent material in low heat electrical and chemical applications.
LDPE is a flexible plastic which makes it a very versatile product with a
wide range of commercial applications. In recent years, LDPE
versatility improved as it emerged as a commonly accepted recyclable
product. The average household today utilizes an assortment of recycled
LDPE products to include:
• Trash can liners
• Compost bins
• Shipping envelopes
• Paneling
• Lumber
• Landscaping ties
• Floor tile
HDPE
is more rigid and harder than lower density materials. It also has
higher tensile strength; four times that of low-density polyethylene. It
is three times better in compressive strength and meets FDA
requirements for direct food contact applications. HDPE is a versatile
plastic with many uses, especially for packaging. It carries low risk of
leaching and is readily recyclable into many goods such as:
• Laundry detergent bottles
• Oil bottles
• Pens
• Recycling container
• Floor tile
• Drainage pipe
• Lumber
• Benches
• Picnic tables
• Fencing
It
is important to us that you understand that Atlantic Poly is doing our
part to protect the environment through our use of recycled products in
our processes. We also encourage you to consider recycling not only the
common household items listed here, but any and all products that you
notice marked with the "recyclable" label.
What you Should Know About Biodegradable Plastics before Banning Plastic Bags
There are types of biodegradable plastics and it is important to distinguish between them; their costs and uses are very different. The two main types are oxo-biodegradable and hydro-biodegradable. Oxo-biodegradable plastics are “good” biodegradable plastic. When purchasing what you believe to be biodegradable, be sure the product is made from Oxo-biodegradable plastic.
In both cases degradation begins with a chemical process followed by a biological process. Both types emit CO2 as they degrade, but hydro-biodegradable can also emit methane. Both types are compostable, but only oxo-biodegradable can be economically recycled. Hydro-biodegradable is much more expensive than oxo-biodegradable.
OXO-BIODEGRADABLE PLASTIC - This new technology produces plastic which degrades by a process of OXO-degradation. The technology is based on a very small amount of pro-degradant additive being added into the manufacturing process, which changes the behavior of the plastic. Degradation begins when the programmed service life is over and the product is no longer required. This “life” of the plastic product is determined at the time of manufacture by the additive formula and can be as little as a few months or as much as a few years.
There is little or no additional cost involved in products made with this technology, which can be made with the same machinery and workforce as conventional plastic products.
The plastic bottles or bags fragment, and will be consumed by bacteria and fungi after the additive has reduced the molecular structure to a level which permits living micro-organisms access to the carbon and hydrogen. So, it is “biodegradable.” This plastic biodegrades to nothing more than CO2, water, and humus, and it does not leave fragments of petro-polymers in the soil.
Oxo-biodegradable polymers do not contain PCBs, nor do they emit methane or nitrous oxide.
HYDRO-BIODEGRADABLE PLASTICS - Some plastics in this category have high starch content and it is sometimes said that this justifies the claim that they are made from renewable resources. However, many of them contain up to 50% of synthetic plastic derived from oil, and others are entirely based on oil-derived intermediates.
Hydro-biodegradable plastics are not genuinely “renewable” because the process of making them is a significant user of fossil-fuel energy and a producer of greenhouse gases.
A disproportionate amount of land would be required to produce sufficient raw material to replace conventional plastic products, along with a huge amount of water.
Plastics made from crops, are up to 400% more expensive, they are not strong enough for use in high-speed machinery, and they emit methane in landfills.
Oxo-bio plastics degrade in the upper layers of a landfill, but they are completely inert deeper in the landfill in the absence of oxygen.
Paper bags use 300% more energy to produce. They are also bulky and heavy to store and are not strong enough, especially when wet. They also emit methane in a landfill.
So before your company decides to eliminate plastic, be sure you know your options and understand the different types of biodegradable plastics.
Paper or Plastic?
Paper or plastic? Ever wonder which is actually the right choice?
Environmentalists, bag manufacturers and garbage specialists have all wondered the same thing, but they come up with different answers.
Plastic bags end up in landfills, or on roadsides, or in lakes and streams, where they prove quite a hazard to wildlife, which choke on the bags.
But bag manufacturers and garbage experts say that in the long run, plastic wins over paper.
"Paper bags are easier to recycle, but they weigh 10 times as much," says Robert Bateman of Roplast Industries, a bag manufacturer. "And paper bags use more energy and cause more waste in the process of manufacturing."
A paper bag eats up almost three times as much energy in the manufacturing process, says Bateman, who's also a past president of the Plastic Bag Association.
That's not something usually emphasized by environmentalists trying to reduce plastic use.
"Plastic bags come out on the right side of the equation on everything except the recycling side," Bateman says.
Is paper better?
Ask a professor specializing in garbage whether paper is better than plastic, and he'll say the equation is relatively easy to solve.
"The answer is very simple and very straightforward," says garbologist Bill Rathje, at the Archaeology Center of Stanford University and a leading authority on what is in America's garbage.
"It's not one that the paper-bag people like to hear. In a dry landfill, paper bags don't degrade any faster than plastic bags. In a normal, well-run landfill, paper bags do not biodegrade any faster over at least 40 years than plastic."
The problem with paper is that it's fatter, he explains.
"Paper bags are much bulkier than plastic, so they fill up more landfill space," Rathje says. "They're three to five times bulkier than plastic, and you can see that yourself at the grocery. Landfills are closing down because they're full. From that perspective, plastic is much better than paper."
Bag manufacturer executive Bateman says that a lot of the wildlife-are-hurt argument is based on anecdotal evidence.
“A seal eating plastic is very rare," he says. "Plastics are durable and light and tend to float. As far as damaging other wildlife is concerned, the worst of it is sort of anecdotal and not representative of what's going on."
The plastic bag is winning the global popularity contest, manufacturers say, and part of that is because plastic is cheap.
"The paper bag is a mass-commodity product and is dying because of the costs involved -- specifically, because of the energy costs," explains Bateman. "Paper is energy-intensive compared to plastic.
Original article on Bankrate.com
1
Archive
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (4)
- July 2023 (4)
- June 2023 (4)
- May 2023 (4)
- April 2023 (4)
- March 2023 (4)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (3)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (3)
- September 2022 (4)
- August 2022 (4)
- July 2022 (4)
- June 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (4)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (4)
- December 2021 (4)
- November 2021 (4)
- October 2021 (4)
- September 2021 (4)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (3)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (4)
- March 2021 (4)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (4)
- November 2020 (4)
- October 2020 (3)
- September 2020 (4)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (3)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (4)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (4)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (4)
- June 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (4)
- March 2019 (4)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (4)
- December 2018 (4)
- November 2018 (5)
- October 2018 (4)
- September 2018 (4)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (4)
- June 2018 (5)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (4)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (4)
- January 2018 (5)
- December 2017 (4)
- November 2017 (4)
- October 2017 (5)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (3)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (4)
- April 2017 (4)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (4)
- December 2016 (5)
- November 2016 (5)
- October 2016 (4)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (5)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (4)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (5)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (5)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (7)
- November 2015 (5)
- October 2015 (4)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (4)
- July 2015 (5)
- June 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (3)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (4)
- February 2015 (4)
- January 2015 (3)
- December 2014 (4)
- November 2014 (4)
- October 2014 (4)
- September 2014 (5)
- August 2014 (5)
- July 2014 (4)
- June 2014 (4)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (3)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (3)
- December 2013 (4)
- November 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (4)
- June 2013 (4)
- May 2013 (3)
- April 2013 (3)
- March 2013 (5)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (3)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (5)
- October 2012 (3)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (5)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (4)
- April 2012 (5)
- March 2012 (3)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (5)
- December 2011 (4)
- November 2011 (5)
- October 2011 (4)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (4)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (5)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (4)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (3)
- September 2010 (4)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (4)
- June 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (5)
- March 2010 (3)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (5)
- December 2009 (6)
- November 2009 (2)
- July 2009 (1)